Scoping review History Timeline and Biographies

A Scoping review is a type of literature review that aims to provide an overview of a broad topic by mapping key concepts, types of evidence, and gaps in research. It is particularly useful in the early stages of research when the area is complex or not well-defined. Unlike systematic reviews, Scoping reviews do not assess the quality of the included studies. They are increasingly recognized as valuable tools in evidence synthesis, guiding future research and informing policy decisions. The development of Scoping reviews has evolved significantly since their inception, contributing to various fields such as healthcare, social sciences, and education.

Creation Time:2024-10-18

Definition of Scoping Review Emerges

The term "Scoping review" was first introduced in the literature, emphasizing its role as a preliminary assessment of a research area, distinct from systematic reviews.

First Comprehensive Framework for Scoping Reviews

The first comprehensive framework for conducting Scoping reviews was proposed, providing guidelines on how to systematically map evidence and identify gaps in research.

Increased Popularity of Scoping Reviews

Scoping reviews gained popularity in various fields, particularly in health research, as researchers recognized their utility in summarizing existing literature and informing practice.

Publication of Key Methodological Papers

Key methodological papers were published, detailing the processes involved in conducting Scoping reviews, including defining the research question and selecting relevant studies.

Establishment of the Joanna Briggs Institute Guidelines

The Joanna Briggs Institute published guidelines for conducting Scoping reviews, providing a standardized approach for researchers and enhancing the rigor of the review process.

Scoping Reviews in Health Policy Research

Scoping reviews became increasingly utilized in health policy research, helping to synthesize evidence for decision-making and policy development.

Introduction of the PRISMA-ScR Statement

The PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) statement was introduced to improve the reporting standards of Scoping reviews.

Scoping Reviews in Nursing and Midwifery

Scoping reviews were recognized as essential tools in nursing and midwifery research, facilitating the identification of research gaps and guiding clinical practice.

Expansion of Scoping Reviews to Other Disciplines

The application of Scoping reviews expanded beyond health research, being adopted in fields such as education, social sciences, and environmental studies to explore diverse topics.

Scoping Reviews During the COVID-19 Pandemic

During the COVID-19 pandemic, Scoping reviews became crucial for synthesizing rapidly emerging evidence and guiding public health responses and policy interventions.

Emergence of Digital Tools for Scoping Reviews

Digital tools and software specifically designed for conducting Scoping reviews were developed, streamlining the process of data extraction and analysis.

Scoping Reviews in Systematic Review Methodology Courses

Scoping reviews were included as a key topic in systematic review methodology courses, highlighting their importance in research training and education.

Integration of Scoping Reviews in Research Funding Applications

Funding bodies began to recognize the value of Scoping reviews in research proposals, encouraging applicants to include them to identify gaps and justify their research objectives.

Continued Evolution and Recognition of Scoping Reviews

Scoping reviews continue to evolve, with ongoing discussions about best practices, methodological advancements, and their role in evidence-based practice across various disciplines.
Download History Timeline

Copyright © 2024 History-timeline.net